Sectors We Serve – Insurance and SIU
Forensic Video & Image Analysis for Insurance & SIU Teams
Authenticate claims footage, detect manipulated images, and build a defensible record for fraud investigations and litigation.
How We Help
Special Investigations Units and claims teams increasingly rely on surveillance video, dash camera footage, and photo evidence to evaluate claims. Primeau Forensics helps insurance carriers and SIU investigators determine whether submitted media is authentic, unaltered, and consistent with the facts of a claim.
Our forensic image and video authentication methodology can identify editing, splicing, frame manipulation, and metadata inconsistencies — critical evidence in suspected staged accidents, exaggerated injury claims, or fraudulent property damage submissions.
What We Offer
- Authentication of claimant-submitted video and photos
- Detection of digitally altered or AI-manipulated images
- Vehicle speed and accident reconstruction support from video
- DVR and dash camera data recovery for claims footage
- Clear, defensible reports for SIU case files
- Expert testimony if a claim proceeds to litigation
Forensic Services for This Sector
We work alongside claims examiners and SIU investigators to turn ambiguous or contested media into a clear factual record. Reports are written to stand on their own in a claim file and to hold up if the matter escalates to litigation, arbitration, or appraisal.
Relevant Case Experience
Civil litigation and claims-related forensic work, including authentication and surveillance video analysis:
- Garcia v. State of New York — rebuttal analysis on cropping and resizing of surveillance video depicting a traffic collision
- Hodder v. Delzell, FBM Logistics, V-Line Logistics — surveillance video analysis and frame timing estimation; site inspection of accident intersection
- Borchardt v. Quinto, Superior Court of California — authentication of three images, with findings of manipulation via Adobe Lightroom
- KMZ Veronika v. Swurve Media Corp. — authentication of screenshots contained within PDF exhibits, found unreliable
- Firmus Centro, LLC v. ATX Self Storage, LLC — eight weeks of surveillance video reviewed and frame extraction for a property/easement dispute
- Ortiz v. Burlein — site inspection, gunshot recreation, and reliability analysis of Ring cloud surveillance audio/video
Need a Second Look at Claims Evidence?
Tell us about the case and the media involved, and we’ll outline next steps.