Forensic Audio, Video & Image Analysis for Attorneys & Law Firms

Trusted by civil and criminal litigators for objective, court-ready forensic evidence analysis and expert witness testimony.

How We Help

Recorded evidence is fragile and easily misinterpreted without a qualified forensic examiner. Primeau Forensics works directly with attorneys and law firms across civil and criminal litigation to authenticate, enhance, clarify, and analyze audio, video, and image evidence so it can withstand scrutiny in deposition, motion hearings, and trial.

Our team has provided expert witness testimony in courts at the local, state, and federal level. We follow best practices established by the Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence (SWGDE), NIST, and ASTM International, and our lead examiner currently chairs the SWGDE video committee, helping shape the standards courts rely on.

What We Offer

Case-ready expert witness testimony and deposition support
Independent, unbiased forensic opinions
Audio, video, and image authentication to test for manipulation
Enhancement and clarification of low-quality recordings
Licensed private investigators for evidence collection
Rebuttal review of opposing expert reports

Forensic Services for This Sector

We routinely support personal injury, criminal defense and prosecution, family law, employment litigation, and insurance defense matters. Whether you need a second opinion on existing forensic work, a full authentication analysis, or a credentialed expert to testify, our reports are built to be transparent, replicable, and defensible under cross-examination.

Relevant Case Experience

A sample of recent expert witness testimony and deposition work across civil and criminal litigation, state and federal courts:

State of Nebraska, Federal Court (Crawford) — body-worn camera video authentication, motion to suppress hearing
Maddox v. Francemone, Northern District of New York — video clarification, image comparison, and gunshot analysis at trial
People v. Hester, Indiana — video authentication of evidence recovered via Google search warrant; testified as rebuttal witness
Tahan v. Kinyar, Oakland County 6th Circuit — NVR acquisition and recovery for a PPO extension hearing
Garcia v. State of New York — forensic video analysis as rebuttal/fact witness on a surveillance recording of a traffic collision
Borchardt v. Quinto, Superior Court of California — digital image authentication, found manipulation via Adobe Lightroom

Have a Case That Needs Forensic Review?

Send us your evidence details and we’ll let you know how we can help — no obligation.